Comparison of Moora and Waspas Methods for Recommendations of Cayenne Pepper Seeds

Agus Tri Wardani(1), Hamdani Hamdani(2), Fahrul Agus(3),


(1) Mulawarman University
(2) Mulawarman University
(3) Mulawarman University

Abstract


Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) encompasses several methodologies, including MOORA and WASPAS. These strategies demonstrate unique approaches and produce varying results. The main aim of this work is to provide a comparative analysis of the MOORA and WASPAS procedures. To achieve this objective, we conduct a detailed analysis that specifically examines five parameters related to cayenne pepper seeds: prospective crop yields, optimal harvesting time, recommended conditions for highland cultivation, weight of 1000 seeds, and plant height. The study utilizes the sensitivity test approach in a comparative analysis framework to ascertain the superior method. The computations using both the MOORA and WASPAS methods determine that the Bisi Hp 35 (A3) alternative is the best choice. This alternative has a MOORA preference value of 0.1463, while the WASPAS approach gives it a preference value of 0.8374. Next, we perform a sensitivity test by increasing the weight criteria for each criterion by 0.5 and 1. The sensitivity analysis indicates that the MOORA approach has a level of 380, whereas the WASPAS method has a level of 376. The data suggest that the MOORA method is more effective than the WASPAS method when it comes to making recommendations for cayenne pepper seeds.

Keywords


Descission Support System; MOORA; WASPAS; Sensitivity Test; Cayenne Pepper Seeds

Full Text:

PDF

References


A. D. Berdie, M. Osaci, I. Muscalagiu, and C. Barz, “A combined approach of AHP and TOPSIS methods applied in the field of integrated software systems,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 200. IOP Publishing, p. 012041, 2017. doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/200/1/012041.

A. Irfanda, I. D. Maysanjaya, and I. M. E. Listartha, “Pengembangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Promo Menu Pada Kafe Kumpulin Coffee Menggunakan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Ratio Analysis (Moora),” Inser. Inf. Syst. Emerg. Technol. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 37–50, 2023. doi: 10.23887/insert.v4i1.59054.

R. D. Sianturi, “Penerapan Metode Waspas untuk Pengambilan Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa/i Baru,” Teknol. Inf. Komput. dan Sains 2019, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2019.

N. Lestari, J. Karman, and B. Santoso, “Komparasi Metode Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) dan Multi-Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio (MOORA) Dalam Penerimaan Dosen,” J. Inf. Sist. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 138–147, 2021.

R. Ramadiani et al., “Decision System for Beneficiaries of the Family Hope Program Using the Rank Order Centroid Method and Weighted Product Method,” Migr. Lett., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1170–1182, 2023, doi: 10.59670/ml.v20i5.4763.

C. L. Salaki and J. Pelealu, “Pemanfaatan Baringtonia Asiatica dan Annona Muricata Terhadap Serangga Vektor Penyakit Pada Tanaman Cabai,” Eugenia, vol. 18, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.35791/eug.18.1.2012.4144.

C. Fadlan, A. P. Windarto, and I. S. Damanik, “Penerapan Metode MOORA pada Sistem Pemilihan Bibit Cabai (Kasus: Desa Bandar Siantar Kecamatan Gunung Malela),” J. Appl. Informatics Comput., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 42–46, 2019, doi: 10.30871/jaic.v3i2.1324.

R. Rina, F. Agus, and U. Hairah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Dosen Pembimbing Magang Fasilkom Unsika Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process,” Jurti, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–24, 2021.

A. Anriani, I. F. Astuti, and F. Agus, “Model Penentuan Kualitas Getah Karet Menggunakan Metode Multi Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (Mabac),” IKRA-ITH Inform. J. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 34–43, 2024, doi: 10.37817/ikraith-informatika.v8i2.2954.

N. Nurhaliza, R. Adha, and M. Mustakim, “Perbandingan Metode Ahp, Topsis, Dan Moora Untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Beasiswa Kurang Mampu,” J. Ilm. Rekayasa dan Manaj. Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 23, 2022, doi: 10.24014/rmsi.v8i1.15298.

F. N. Khasanah and D. Setiyadi, “Uji Sensitivitas Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dan Weighted Product Dalam Menentukan Laptop,” Bina Insa. Ict J., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 165–174, 2019.

G. Phylosta and H. Sulistiani, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Untuk Persetujuan Pemberian Pinjaman Menggunakan Metode Profile Matching Berbasis Web (Studi Kasus Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Smpn 1 Hulu Sungkai),” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 49–55, 2022. doi: 10.33365/jtsi.v3i3.2000.

G. Lestari and A. Savitri Puspaningrum, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Tunjangan Karyawan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Ahp) Studi Kasus: Pt Mutiara Ferindo Internusa,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 38–48, 2021. doi: 10.33365/jtsi.v2i3.860.

M. E. Jumaddin, D. Agus, F., and A. H. Kridalaksana, “Perbandingan Metode Simple Additive Weigthing Dan Weighted Product Untuk Pemilihan Atlet Terbaik Pada Ukm Mulawarman University Chess Club,” Semin. Nas. Ilmu Komput. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 50–58, 2018.

D. M. Ariska, I. F. Astuti, and F. Agus, “Rancangan dan Implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Tanaman Karet,” IKRA-ITH Inform. J. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 82–91, 2024, doi: 10.37817/ikraith-informatika.v8i2.2961.

Ekastini, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Keputusan Pemilihan Pemasok Kayu Terbaik,” Jinteks (Jurnal Inform. Teknol. dan Sains), vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 346–350, 2023. doi: 10.51401/jinteks.v5i3.3235 .

A. Muharsyah, S. R. Hayati, M. I. Setiawan, H. Nurdiyanto, and Yuhandri, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Multi Obective Optimization On the Basis Of Ratio Analysis (MOORA),” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 19–23, 2018. doi: 10.26623/transformatika.v17i1.1311.

A. Ulva, D. Iqbal, N. Nuraini, and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Bibit Lele Terbaik Menggunakan Metode MOORA (Multi-Objective Optimization On The Basis Of Ratio Analysis) dan WASPAS (Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment),” Junal Inform., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 177–185, 2018, [Online].

A. P. Nanda, S. Sucipto, and S. Hartati, “Analisis Menentukan Jasa Pengirim Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS),” Expert J. Manaj. Sist. Inf. dan Teknol., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 42, 2020, doi: 10.36448/jmsit.v10i2.1594.

W. R. K. Jayawardani and M. Maryam, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan dengan Implementasi Metode SAW dan Pembobotan ROC,” Emit. J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 99–109, 2022, doi: 10.23917/emitor.v22i2.18411.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (JCSE)
ISSN 2721-0251 (online)
Published by : ICSE (Institute of Computer Sciences and Engineering)
Website : http://icsejournal.com/index.php/JCSE/
Email: jcse@icsejournal.com

Creative Commons License is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.