Statistical Analysis of Adaptive Thresholding Algorithms for Denoising Signature Images

Ruhiteswar Choudhury(1), Tanusree Deb Roy(2),


(1) Assam University, Silchar
(2) Assam University, Silchar, India

Abstract


This study explores the efficacy of adaptive thresholding techniques in denoising signature images captured under varying lighting conditions. Signature images from multiple individuals were obtained in different illumination scenarios, and three prominent adaptive thresholding algorithms, namely histogram thresholding, Otsu’s method, and the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), were applied to the noisy images. The performance of each technique was rigorously evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient metrics. The findings reveal that the Gaussian Mixture Model significantly outperformed both histogram thresholding and Otsu’s method, achieving superior noise reduction and better preservation of essential information. This was evidenced by lower RMSE values and higher correlation coefficients. These results suggest that the Gaussian Mixture Model is a highly effective technique for denoising signature images, particularly under varying lighting conditions. Its superior performance underscores its potential as a robust tool for enhancing the clarity and accuracy of signature verification systems. This study provides valuable insights into the application of adaptive thresholding techniques in image processing, highlighting the advantages of the Gaussian Mixture Model over traditional methods. The implications of this research are substantial for fields that rely on precise signature recognition and verification, such as banking, legal documentation, and security systems. This study specifically focuses on signature segmentation as a preprocessing step for signature verification systems. It does not directly address full document verification but aims to improve segmentation accuracy under varying lighting conditions, which is a foundational component in document authentication pipelines.
    

Keywords


Digital Image Processing, Biometry, Gaussian Mixture Model, Otsu Thresholding, Histogram Thresholding.

Full Text:

PDF

References


H. Gupta and K. Chauhan, “Role of biometric security for the enhancement of data security,” Int. J. Comput. Technol., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 6184–6189, 2015. doi: 10.24297/ijct.v14i10.1832.

E. Maiorana and P. Campisi, “Signature biometrics,” Encycl. Cryptogr. Secur. Priv., pp. 1–5, 2021.

D. Impedovo and G. Pirlo, “Automatic signature verification: The state of the art,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 609–635, 2008. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.923866.

U. M. Butt, S. Ahmad, F. Shafait, C. Nansen, A. S. Mian, and M. I. Malik, “Automatic signature segmentation using hyper-spectral imaging,” Int. Conf. Front. Handwrit. Recognit., pp. 19–24, 2016. doi: 10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0017.

R. Mandal, P. P. Roy, U. Pal, and M. Blumenstein, “Signature segmentation and recognition from scanned documents,” Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Des. Appl., pp. 80–85, 2013. doi: 10.1109/ISDA.2013.6920712.

X. Wang and Y. Su, “Image encryption based on compressed sensing and DNA encoding,” Signal Process. Image Commun., vol. 95, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.image.2021.116246.

V. Kumar and P. Gupta, “Importance of Statistical Measures in Digital Image Processing,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 56–62, 2012.

J. S. Weszka, R. N. Nagel, and A. Rosenfeld, “A threshold selection technique,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 100, no. 12, pp. 1322–1326, 1974. doi: 10.1109/T-C.1974.223858.

A. Elen and E. Dönmez, “Histogram-based global thresholding method for image binarization,” Optik, vol. 306, p. 171814, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2024.171814.

K. K. Brar et al., “Image segmentation review: Theoretical background and recent advances,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 114, p. 102608, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102608.

N. Otsu, “A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., vol. 9, no. 1, 1979. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076.

C. Saharia, J. Ho, W. Chan, T. Salimans, D. J. Fleet, and M. Norouzi, “Image super-resolution via iterative refinement,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 4713–4726, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3204461.

X. Xu, S. Xu, L. Jin, and E. Song, “Characteristic analysis of Otsu threshold and its applications,” Pattern Recognit. Lett., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 956–961, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.01.02. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.01.02.

V. Saini, M. Khurana, and R. K. Challa, “A Hybrid Model for the Segmentation of Mammogram Images using Otsu Thresholding, Morphology and U-Net,” Biomed. Pharmacol. J., vol. 18, no. 1, 2025.

M. A. Mahjoub, “Image segmentation by adaptive distance based on EM algorithm,” 2012, arXiv preprint: arXiv:1204.1629.

X. Liu, Y. Zhao, S. Wang, and J. Wei, “G-SAM: GMM-based segment anything model for medical image classification and segmentation,” Clust. Comput., vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 14231–14245, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10586-024-04679-x.

M. Schwab, A. Mayr, and M. Haltmeier, “Deep Gaussian Mixture Model for Unsupervised Image Segmentation,” in Machine Learning, Optimization, and Data Science, vol. 15509, G. Nicosia, V. Ojha, S. Giesselbach, M. P. Pardalos, and R. Umeton, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 15509. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 339–352. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-82484-5_25.

A. Kartakoullis, N. Caporaso, M. B. Whitworth, and I. D. Fisk, “Gaussian mixture model clustering allows accurate semantic image segmentation of wheat kernels from near-infrared hyperspectral images,” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 259, p. 105341, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2025.105341.

H. Peng, C. Luo, L. He, and H. Tang, “Embedded Particle Size Measurement Method of Metal Mineral Polished Section Using Gaussian Mixture Model Based on Expectation Maximization Algorithm,” Minerals, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 358, 2024. doi: 10.3390/min14040358.

A. M. Mogharen, M. Wang, X. Yin, X. Jia, and J. Hu, “U-Net-Based Fingerprint Enhancement for 3D Fingerprint Recognition,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 13–84, 2025. doi: 10.3390/s25051384.

J. Lee Rodgers and W. A. Nicewander, “Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient,” Am. Stat., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 1988. doi: 10.1080/00031305.1988.10475524.

Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheik, and E. P. Simoncelli, “Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,” IEEE Trans. Image Process., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2004. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.

Z. Wang, X. Cun, J. Bao, W. Zhou, J. Liu, and H. Li, “Uformer: A general u-shaped transformer for image restoration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 17683–17693. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.03106.

P. Roy, S. Dutta, N. Dey, G. Dey, S. Chakraborty, and R. Ray, “Adaptive thresholding: A comparative study,” presented at the International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Communication and Computational Technologies (ICCICCT), 2014, pp. 1182–1186. doi: 10.1109/ICCICCT.2014.6993140.

Y. Cai et al., “Mask-guided spectral-wise transformer for efficient hyperspectral image reconstruction,” Proc. IEEECVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 17502–17511, 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.07910.

P. D. R. Raju and G. Neelima, “Image segmentation by using histogram thresholding,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 776–779, 2012.

J. Yousefi, “Image binarization using otsu thresholding algorithm,” Ont. Can. Univ. Guelph 10, 2011.

M. Haugh, The EM algorithm. Machine Learning for OR & FE, 2015.

S. Karimijafarbigloo, S. Azad, A. Kazerouni, and D. Merhof, “MedScale-Former: Self-guided multiscale transformer for medical image segmentation,” Med. Image Anal., 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2025.103554.

I. Bakurov, M. Buzzelli, R. Schettini, M. Castelli, and L. Vanneschi, “Structural similarity index (SSIM) revisited: A data-driven approach,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 189, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116087.

T. Chai and R. R. Draxler, “Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?– Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature,” Geosci. Model Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1247–1250, 2014. doi: 10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014.

Tian, W., Mu, Z., Lu, Y., Cai, S., Xiong, Y., & Huang, Y. (2025). A fast level set segmentation algorithm for sonar images driven by Gaussian Mixture Model probability. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 129, 16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2025.05.036.

Lv, M., Liu, H., Wang, M., Wang, D., Li, H., Lu, X., ... & Li, Q. (2025). Small Scale Multi-Object Segmentation in Mid-Infrared Image Using the Image Timing Features–Gaussian Mixture Model and Convolutional-UNet. Sensors, 25(11), 3440. doi: 10.3390/s25113440.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (JCSE)
ISSN 2721-0251 (online)
Published by : ICSE (Institute of Computer Sciences and Engineering)
Website : http://icsejournal.com/index.php/JCSE/
Email: jcse@icsejournal.com

Creative Commons License is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.